Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifebooker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Lifebooker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

blatant promotion Light2021 (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  08:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  08:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  08:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete did not achieve notability. Fails WP:CORP for lack of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Coverage is mostly from less than reliable sources such as couponcodeslady.com, or not independent such as the interview with Lauren Tesar in "Google's Big Fat Search Overhaul: Just Doing What Google Does". Of the "The 100 Most Valuable Startups In The World, Revamped And Revised!" Lifebooker was #113. Basically just blurbs.   In passing, Lifebooker was one of the businesses targeted by UnsubscribeDeals.com for their relentless daily emails and convoluted unsubscribe process.  --Bejnar (talk) 05:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- an advertorial, with sections "Services for Users" and "Services for Businesses". Wikipedia is not a free means of promotion; this content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.