Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifecycles: A Story of AIDS in Malawi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Lifecycles: A Story of AIDS in Malawi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another non-notable film article created by Matzonyc. Editor created the Doug Karr article in 2008, and articles for some Karr-produced films, all non-notable - and the account created nothing else. Purely self-promotional. Argles Barkley (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Argles Barkley (talk) 22:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. I did all the recommended searched and found nothing to suggest notability. CT55555 (talk) 22:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very obscure film with no RT entry (surprisingly), can find two refs in Books, but all are trivial mentions (1, 2). Also found a niche PDF on Google Scholar, but is it an RS? IMO it's probably marginally reliable and doesn't count towards GNG. But still, these sources don't provide multiple, reliable, indepedent refs to meet GNG or the first criteria of Notability (film), and I couldn't see this being re-released five years after or winning a notable award, so I support deletion. Ping me if there is more refs. VickKiang (talk) 22:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Africa. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 19:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Films are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist — the notability test for films requires some evidence of significance, such as notable film awards and/or critical analysis by professional film critics in media. But the only review here is not from a reliable or WP:GNG-worthy source, and on a ProQuest search for 20-year-old coverage that might not have googled turned up absolutely nothing. Bearcat (talk) 12:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.