Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifehouse International Church Taipei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with Lifehouse International Church. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Lifehouse International Church Taipei

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not satisfy notability criteria listed at Notability_(organizations_and_companies), especially it lacks reports from independent sources Jlicy (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 29.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge to Lifehouse International Church --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Merging is a good idea indeed. I don't see much salvageable content though, for lack of independent references. Jlicy (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The WP:SELFSOURCE information from this article can be used as sources in the merged to article, just can't be the source for notability for this article--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   06:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.