Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifeless (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Lifeless (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable TV movie. Current sources in article are unreliable. Couldn't find any reliable sourcing, or even what network it aired on. Prod contested. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment – I don't even recall creating this stub 10 years ago, and don't know how I stumbled upon it. I'm not familiar with what are the notability criteria for TV movies and series and such, nor with the reliability of sites like IMDB, so I'll leave it for others to consider.  Note that IMDB says it was a 2008 TV movie (before the series?  or same things?  not sure). Dicklyon (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * IMDb is not considered reliable, as the content is user submitted. Dread Central and 28 Days Later Analysis do not appear to be reliable sources, as there is little attribution of writers and no evidence of editorial oversight. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Dread Central is definitely a reliable source. See WikiProject Horror/Sources Donald D23   talk to me  12:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I still challenge that, though. There are no editor credits anywhere on the site. What makes it reliable? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Because Wikipedia consensus has determined that it is a reliable source. Otherwise it wouldn't be listed there.WikiProject_Film/Resources states "The following is a list of sources that have been established as reliable in the field of films per past consensus" and Dread Central is listed. Your opinion does not outweigh consensus. Donald D23   talk to me  13:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * So it's just my opinion that the site does not have an editor. Got it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Not, it is your opinion that the site isn't reliable. Wikipedia consensus says it is. If you disagree, open another discussion regarding the site's reliability. However, my prediction is that you will lose that discussion. Donald D23   talk to me  13:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Under what "consensus" was it agreed? I found nothing on WP:HORROR or WP:RSN. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * They have an editor-in-chief and managing-editor at least.★Trekker (talk) 17:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ETA: From the "coming soon" tone of the sources, I'm not 100% sure this ever even aired at all. I certainly can't find any proof that it did. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Even though Dread Central is a RS, the article itself is just a 'coming attraction' piece and not a review. Nothing else was found during a search. Donald D23   talk to me  12:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete we do not have sourcing to meet our criteria for adequate sourcing for a production.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delted apparently aired 3 episodes on Fearnet.com. Blog/forum posts all I can find. Fails GNG. WikiVirusC (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.