Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifi Publications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Lifi Publications

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I feel that this company doesn't have sufficient coverage for Wikipedia company guidelines. Glassesgalore123 (talk) 22:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Glassesgalore123 (talk) 22:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: An article setting out the wares of a division of a firm which has no article in itself. This division appears to solicit authors' manuscripts: " a new venture by of DK Agencies in which we get your fiction novels published for the world to read" . Passing mentions can be found in PR for publishing events, but not the detailed coverage of this firm/imprint itself; fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. I'm assuming all the sources are reliable and the publishers are corporately independent from the topic organization - but there's more requirements than that for establishing notability. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Not a single reference either mentioned above or in the article meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. Could only find passing mentions in coverage. LibStar (talk) 22:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete agree that it fails WP:CORP. Chelokabob (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.