Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifoti Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Lifoti_Magazine
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: User:Zanimum recently moved this draft to article space without verifying the citations. Nearly all citations are self-publications. None are independent, reliable sources. Please add sources, if possible. Otherwise, this page does not belong in article space at this moment in time. HSE001 (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Do not draftify at least the content is verifiable and not transparently promotional, which puts it ahead of many, many mainspace articles. I have my doubts about notability, and if more independent sources can't be found, it should be deleted as GNG fail. buidhe 02:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 May 2.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 02:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Note, I've moved this back into the draft space. I slipped in the review, that said with a significant audited circulation, there is a possibility that the article can be improved upon by its creator. --  Zanimum (talk) 04:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm reading Buidhe's comment above, returning it to the article space. --  Zanimum (talk) 04:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - Zanimum, there was not a single independent, reliable source in the draft. Citation 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 are all self-publicational or user-generated pages, potentially from the subject. Citation 3 is not a reliable source. Once there are reliable sources then it can be considered for article space. Otherwise, this is promotional and spam. HSE001 (talk) 20:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - as promotional. Almost all the sources are from the magazine itself.  No reliable indication of notability. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:38, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.