Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lift and Escalator Industry Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Specialist Engineering Contractors Group. At least until size considerations require a spinoff.  Sandstein  07:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Lift and Escalator Industry Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Delete. Non-notable per WP:ORG. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * merge This is apparently the principal national organization in its field, and therefore notable. But given the present lack of material, there's an obvious merge possible to Specialist Engineering Contractors Group,  It can be expanded later.  DGG ( talk ) 03:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some information about the trade show that it operates. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:28, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a significant industry sector, but currently poorly covered in Wikipedia. Stubs like these needed to (hopefully) help stimulate more editorial contributions, references, etc. Paul W (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Merge per DGG's argument, given the difficulty of finding independent in-depth coverage on this particular organization. Ammodramus (talk) 19:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalk stalk 19:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge, as suggested by DGG. Just doesn't seem to be enough info available here at the moment, but I can see how the Specialist Engineering Contractors Group page could quickly become quite cumbersome if editors started adding to the six different associations in it.  Until then, though, it seems it'd be most efficient and accessible with them together there on that page. Zujua (talk) 07:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.