Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light Side of the Moon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 15:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Light Side of the Moon
Vanity page on a non notable Internet show that doesn't even exist yet. Presence on the web (besides from their own blog): 0 hits. - Phaedriel  18:03, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Why dyou have to be a jerk?! I worked hard on this!! Me and my friend are trying to get our show up this week, and we wanted to be in Wikipedia. Were just starting out, duh we wouldnt be know very well yet! Can't you just leave it be? Geez!!    Bert
 * Previous comment is by User:Kitsunetsuki22. After each comment/vote, please sign like this: ~ . Englishrose 18:22, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete actually speedied once before in a probably out of process deletion, but anyway - it doesn't exist yet etc. WhiteNight T 18:24, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Why dyou want to delete it? Its not hurting you now is it? ~ . Bert 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not-notable. Wikipedia is not the place for publicity or advertising.  If and when the show takes off and becomes notable, that would be the time to list it here.  In the meantime, might I suggest you get a MySpace account?  You should also look over WP:WEB.  -- MisterHand 18:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The show kicks off in a week from today, so what would be the point of deleting the wikipedia now only to update the show's status in a mere 7 days? Besides the fact that MySpace hosts BANDS...how would that help? it'd be useless! Wikipedia is a free encyclodpedia for everyone's use, and if they wish to add a description of their show on it without quite advertising it then it's their right! Tell me, what's the difference between wikipedia's pages for "The Light Side of the Moon" and "Whose Line is it Anyways?" Sure they haven't had the chance Whose Line had, but if you're offended by this in any way by this, DON'T WATCH THEIR SHOW! Leave 'em alone! Everyone's got a point of view, and a right to bear their own opinions, but why don't we all save those up for bigger, more important issues, eh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.219.168.45 (talk • contribs)
 * Sorry, Kitsunetsuki22, but in addition to the considerations above, I also tend not to pay much attention to people who vandalize articles. - Phaedriel  19:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I never vandalized Bush, I put the stuff about him tapping phones etc., and who cares about Bush anyways? America sucks, too bad I live in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitsunetsuki22 (talk • contribs)
 * You just don't get it. Delete per nom. --Agamemnon2 04:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If and when they make a notable contribution to anything the page will have a reason to exist. Until then, there is no reason for it to be here. -- (aeropagitica) [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|25px|UK]] 19:50, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable show, advertising. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 20:40, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. First become notable, then become the subject of a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is not for self-promotion or advertising. --Metropolitan90 21:15, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Were just starting out, duh we wouldnt be know very well yet!" My sentiments exactly. --Tothebarricades 00:58, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and WP:SOAP. rodii 21:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Ok, ok, delete it if you must, but I can make it once the show is well known, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitsunetsuki22 (talk • contribs)
 * Not just known, notable, which is a higher bar to get over. And you shouldn't be writing articles about your own work anyway. If it's truly notable, some else will do it for you. Just get over the idea that Wikipedia is here so you can pimp your own projects. It's not like listing your site on Yahoo or something. Seriously: read this. rodii 01:04, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

-> I'd say just let them delete it...Once you get viewers and fans and whatnot, then you'll have the support you need here at wikipedia- until then the people here obviously don't have their proof of your hard work at attempting the show... Let them delete your profile, keep it running, get viewers/more supporters/what-nots, then hopefully the people here at wikipedia won't be so hard on you. ...And I'm sorry I don't have my own Wikipedia account with which to sign my comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.219.173.9 (talk • contribs)

Pimp?! Ok, just because I'm from the south-side of Chicago doesn't mean I'm some fag ganster guy. but, ok, whatever.

Sorry about all of the crap guys, just delete my wikipedia article if you have to.


 * I would let them keep it, but if you at Wikipedia must...delete it.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.