Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light frequency waves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete as wrong, redundant, OR and other problems identified below.

Light_frequency_waves
See discussion -- part of Light, facts wrong, not an article Fnarf999 23:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)


 * delete See the discussion. This is a mess, it's wrong, it's all in Light already, and no one would ever look for it here. This is not an article. Fnarf999 23:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per discussion Zero sharp 00:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete contains hopelessly incorrect information and rewriting it from scratch would result in a subset of the existing Light article. Gw e rnol 00:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's all in light already, the facts are incorrect, and "Light Frequency waves" is an incorrect name, since it implies that the article is about a type of light waves called "Light frequency" waves, when a correct name would be "Light wave frequencies". Beno1000 00:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless the article is significantly edited to indicate (with reliable sources) (1) that the term is actually used (2) with that meaning. I have serious doubts.  If that were done, the other factual errors could be fixed.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 04:00, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bad idea, bad science, bad article. --Bduke 04:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above -- Nonsuch 04:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  04:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Cedars 08:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.