Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightmotiv


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was: Speedily deleted - spam, no claim of notability. - Mike Rosoft 10:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Lightmotiv

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I just don't see the importance and the article does not assert the notability of the invention. It's possibly spam. Just because it has a patent doesn't mean it's notable.  Pig manTalk to me 19:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete per db-ad. Djma12 19:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I was probably being too kind and cautious to go to AfD from my initial prod when the author protested. Sometimes I don't trust my judgment. Live and learn.  Pig manTalk to me 19:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete CSD G11. So tagged. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  20:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * speedy delete: this is spam, pure and simple, liquid-lense projectors have been popular for ages especially with muscicians (60s psychadelic practically had a fetish for them), a specific non-notable projector isn't worthy of an article. Wintermut3 04:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.