Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightning War


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. All keep votes, despite appearing to be by noted Wikipedia users, are by sock puppets. See edit history. &mdash; J I P | Talk 04:41, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Lightning War
Not notable group with one? release. Doesn't meet WP:MUSIC. feydey 14:21, 3 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep "6. Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (or both, as in British hip hop)"... Looks like it does to me, the article mentions that they "found infamy in the local area". Wahoofive actually posted by 172.200.189.73 &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC  17:02, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you for correcting the record, Lomn. No vote. &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 06:14, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Without citation, the above "found infamy" quote reeks of band vanity. &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 17:50, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I also like the clean redirect to blitzkrieg per Marskell. &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 19:08, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost reads like a hoax. Vanity and not up to WP:MUSIC in any case unless notability better asserted. After deletion re-post as a clean re-direct to Blitzkrieg (note if this is kept it should be a disambig between Blitzkrieg and the band). Marskell 17:58, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, they do not meet WP:MUSIC. An unsourced assertion of "finding infamy" is so very not an indication of meeting criteria 6.  Give me something verifiable to suggest they meet the guideline, and I could change my mind.  A redirect to Blitzkrieg per above sounds OK by me.  Friday (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete content and redirect to Blitzkrieg. Djbrianuk 22:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Changed 'infamy' to 'much opposition' because for some reason people around here have an aversion to the former.Anonymous, 10:49, 6th October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:MUSIC. Prozak, 12:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. As Above. User:Piccadilly, 11:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity. No evidence of notability. Should be redirected to Blitzkrieg as per above [[User:Consequencefree| Ardent &dagger; &isin; ]] 10:44, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per Marskell. --JoanneB 10:46, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, No evidence of vanity. Jonny2x4 19:44, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. 23skidoo 22:46, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, does meet WP:MUSIC as stated. I added a bracket after "(or 'cybergrind' band" where it is clearly required.
 * Comment: I just read the article again. I still see nothing to indicate that this band meets WP:MUSIC guidelines.  Can anyone explain?  Friday (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it does meet WP:MUSIC as has been explained previously. Death, 09:21, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.