Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lighton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Lighton

 * – ( View AfD View log )

"A lighton is a hypothetical subatomic particle that moves faster than light." Only fractionally better than original research. Almost superflous to point out that the author of the article is the creator of this theory. Has been described in the International Journal of Sciences which does not yet have an article here - it did only start in August. But given that, its claim to be "one of the world's most cited scientific journals" is somewhat questionable. &mdash; RHaworth 21:24, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 05:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 *  Merge Delete or Redirect  (is what I meant) to Tachyon. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC).
 * Redirect to Tachyon. (there is nothing to merge) TR 08:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for pointing out the tachyon. I would now say delete as vandalism - the text is cribbed from the tachyon article and there is no evidence that anyone uses the term lighton. &mdash; RHaworth 08:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete and oppose redirect. I see no evidence that the term "lighton" is actually used as a synonym for tachyon, rather than just completely made up. -- Whpq (talk) 16:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. It simply does not meet notability guidelines.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:02, 15 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete term completely made up. --Meno25 (talk) 06:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. COI article used as a soapbox. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.