Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightspeed LA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Tencent Games. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Lightspeed LA

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Game studio of Tencent. Standalone notability appears insufficient, perhaps WP:TOOSOON. IgelRM (talk) 11:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and California. IgelRM (talk) 11:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to Tencent Games as not passing WP:NCORP. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  14:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete After five years, they've never actually created a game, so this is more notable for being yet another gaming industry money effigy pit more than for its actual value as a game studio.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 20:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The studio deserves a page. They've just announced their first game. Wariorio10 (talk) 21:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Announcing a game doesn't give you a free pass to have an article about your game and studio, since Wikipedia is not for advertising spam - it needs an encyclopedic reason to exist. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * People come to Wikipedia for information. It doesn't matter if it's a little bit of information or not, as long as the article provides accurate information, it deserves to exist. This page can be expanded in the future over time. Wariorio10 (talk) 22:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Accuracy alone is insufficient for inclusion. Cortador (talk) 09:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete or Draftify given the announced game may come to fruition. But this obviously attracts WP:GNG. Put it this way, if the studio's notability hinges on the studio's announcement of Last Sentinel, an article for Last Sentinel itself would be draftified for being WP:TOOSOON. Pre-release coverage for things yet to materialise should always be dealt with caution as the coverage is largely reliant about what the studio is saying about itself. This is indicated by the presser-style news articles, and inclusion of interviews and YouTube channels. The studio just hasn't reached a point yet where anything can be said about it other than what the studio is announcing and telling media itself. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge with Tencent Games. The studio isn't notable by itself. One announced game won't change that, and sources are more likely to report on that game than on the studio specifically.
 * Merge to Tencent Games as WP:ATD, unable to find anything that meets GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 19:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.