Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightspeed Media Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 00:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Lightspeed Media Corporation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Strong Delete Not notable: only 2 references, no assertion of notablity. Contains 4 links, all of which are link spam. PEAR (talk) 19:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

(and possibly others) -SpuriousQ (talk) 22:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Isn't this already discussed here Shabda 19:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment No, that was a discussion about the article on Tori Stone (which is even less notable) one of the 'Lightspeed' prostitutes. --PEAR (talk) 19:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * keep - notable internet pr0n company. Owner has been written up in the Wall Street Journal. Link added to article. PS PEAR, I think your comment above reveals a bias.... AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 19:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per AllGlory. VanTucky  (talk) 19:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment As Tori Stone, Tawnee Stone, and Jordan Capri were merged into this article, past XfDs of interest include
 * Articles for deletion/Tori Stone
 * Votes for deletion/Jordan Capri
 * Articles for deletion/Jordan Capri
 * Articles for deletion/Tawnee Stone
 * Articles for deletion/Tawnee Stone 2
 * Strong delete - No evidence of multiple independent reliable sources giving coverage to allow verifiability for most of the article. Valrith 19:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - evidently notable. Such organizations will be hard to have reliable proof of notability, but just about every hard drive in the free world will have some Lightspeed media on it. Well, 50% at any rate ;)  —  MapsMan  [  talk  |  cont  ] — 23:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per AllGlory and MapsMan  Mathmo Talk 23:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This is just silly. A Google search shows 222,000 hits for "tori stone," 1,080,000 for "Tawnee Stone," 1,130,000 for "Jordan Capri." How many hits do we need? Binky The WonderSkull 16:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Google searches for porn stars do not show evidence of notability. Valrith 21:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.