Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightweight Communications and Marshalling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   procedural close - page speedy deleted. PhilKnight (talk) 00:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Lightweight Communications and Marshalling

 * – (View AfD)

Based on the following web search: the article subject appears to lack significant coverage in reliable sources, and so doesn't comply with the notability guideline. PhilKnight (talk) 16:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. RayAYang (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- RayAYang (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete While Google is not always the best measure of notability, it is a good yardstick for IT and tech items. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN open source project that AFAICT has only ever been used by its original authors. 'Users' mailing list only shows up posts by the three people listed as project admins.  JulesH (talk) 21:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- RayAYang (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete While Google is not always the best measure of notability, it is a good yardstick for IT and tech items. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN open source project that AFAICT has only ever been used by its original authors. 'Users' mailing list only shows up posts by the three people listed as project admins.  JulesH (talk) 21:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Howdy, I created the page. I believe that LCM's notability in the robotics community is above threshold [1], and I believe the page serves a useful disambiguation purpose. However, I agree that, by the metrics mentioned above, it seems relatively unnotable. I am open to deleting the page for now and revisiting the issue sometime in the future. EdwinOlson (talk) 00:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

[1] http://duerer.usc.edu/pipermail/robotics-worldwide/2008-October/001470.html)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.