Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilarcor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete per WP:V if not for the reasons given. The reasons given for keeping it are spurious. Sandstein (talk) 08:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Lilarcor

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable fictional object. prod removed by User:Athaenara, so listing at AfD. Because there are so few substantial, reliable third-party sources for this topic, it is difficult to write a sustainable Wikipedia article on the subject. Mikeblas 17:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 23:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete only has in-universe notability, does not meet notability standards for fiction. Pastordavid (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I read the concern after seeing this article in Category:Proposed deletion, read the article, found it interesting, saw that it was linked in five other articles, and looked at some of the 4,430 ‘Lilarcor sword -wikipedia’ ghits.  I had never heard of it before, know nothing about any of the games it's in and do not care to presume non-notability (fiction).  — Athaenara  ✉  01:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge&rarr;Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn The sword is listed in the "Prominent characters" section and the use in mods could be included in either the "Trivia" section or in a subsection of "Priminent characters". I agree that the article should not be maintained as a stand-alone. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 19:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 19:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.