Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lildo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Lildo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A supposed cocktail, that I can find no evidence of its existance. Either it was completely WP:MADEUP, or has no notability. Either way, it should be deleted. I've found a few bars named "Lildo", but nothing to indicate that they have any sort of drink named for them that is notable. PROD was removed by the article creator without comment. Rorshacma (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. If this isn't the personal creation of the article's primary author, it's indistinguishable from that. Searches for "lildo" that include any or all of the ingredients are entirely unproductive (for example: ). Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think the key ingredient in this drink is the commercial "Sourz" liqueur. A search for "lildo" and "sourz" produces nothing. I was also unable to find any mention of this drink (ingredients-wise) with respect to the Sourz brand.  Non-notable and likely either made up by the author or by a local pub. SQGibbon (talk) 18:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete A completely undocumented drink, leaving editors like me to wonder if this is a hoax. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.