Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lili & Lola


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Lili & Lola

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a television series, not properly referenced as passing WP:TVSHOW. As usual, television shows don't get automatic notability freebies just because you single-source the fact that they exist; the notability test requires more evidence of significance, such as notable television awards and/or the reception of considerably more than just one piece of coverage. But this literally just says that the show exists, the end, and is referenced to just one very short blurb in a trade magazine, which isn't enough, and even on a search for better sources I'm essentially only finding press releases from its own production company rather than any independent coverage in real media. Bearcat (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Update: A few new sources have been added, but they aren't an improvement. Two are still primary sources — the show's own press release about itself and its directory entry in a tablet app store — and the only one that comes from an independent media outlet is covering it in the context of being named a winner of that media outlet's own proprietary awards, which are not a notability-clinching award for a television show. There's also an unsourced claim added that it won a Leo Award, but the Leo Awards are also not a notability-clinching award for a television show, because they are not an award that gets covered by the media either. (I've tried to source Leo Award wins in Canadian film or television articles, and I very regularly can't.) "Notability because awards" does not attach to just every award that exists: it attaches only to awards that get covered by the media in order to establish that the award itself is notable enough to make its winners notable for winning it, and not to awards that you have to source to the awarding organization's own self-published content about itself or a YouTube video. Bearcat (talk) 17:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.