Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lili Francks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:59, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Lili Francks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An actress who has had a fair number of roles, but nothing significant enough to garner her media attention or satisfy WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to fail WP:ACTOR. I was hoping to see something related to her heritage that would bring her some credibility but six pages into a Google search I gave up. § FreeRangeFrog 04:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment While I agree that the career has not been notable when looking at film or television roles, I did find multiple independent articles about stage performances. She may qualify under WP:ENT condition that "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions".  For instance, she recently performed in the "Golden Dragon" in Toronto that received coverage in National Post, Globe and Mail, and Toronto Star and was nominated for Best Ensemble at the Dora Awards (apparently a thing).  Prior to that she was in Goodness by Michael Redhill (which judging by the extensive coverage would probably pas notable if the play had an article about it) for a number of years. I'm leaning toward Delete, because few mentions rise above trivial mentions in reviews and because as nom "a fair number of roles, but nothing significant enough to garner her media attention". But just think we need to think about whether she gets the career exception by being in a fair number of roles. AbstractIllusions (talk) 22:25, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Since yesterday, looked at every article that mentioned her in a couple databases (going back to 1992) and mentions were either trivial or inherited (related to her daughter). Nominator summarized the position excellently: Fair number of roles, but nothing that got subject coverage about the actress. AbstractIllusions (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.