Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lili Winery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete and salted.  An as  talk? 11:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Lili Winery

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject fails WP:CORP. 9 Google hits does not show that it has been the subject of any reliable secondary sources. Author has the same name and has recreated the article after some 6 deletions; I smell WP:COI.  An as  talk? 08:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, my patience is wearing thin on this one. The Rambling Man 09:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and protect from recreation. Closenplay 11:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete pn & per above. Not notable, probably conflict of interest as well.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt this one too. -Ebyabe 14:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Oysterguitarist 20:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Question What about the two awards for the wines?DGG (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Did some digging: the Finger Lakes award is not particularly impressive, they gave out over 50 bronze medals to cabernet sauvignons. The IWSC award seems more notable; still, there were 10 "silver (best in class)" awards given to cabernet sauvignons. Closenplay 09:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Good work, so still failing to achieve notability. Delete.  The Rambling Man 20:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 14:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * D -- Y not? 14:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletions.   —nadav (talk) 22:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - I deleted this (a previous incarnation) earlier, and the COI and everything seems pretty obvious. Salting would probably be a good idea, given the number of recreations. Nihiltres ( t .l ) 04:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.