Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liliana Zagacka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Joyous! | Talk 03:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Liliana Zagacka

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Besides the linked World Athletics profile, other databases, and many, many mirrors of Wikipedia, I couldn't find anything about this athlete (WP:SPORTBASIC). Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 23:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Women.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 23:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. According to, she may be notable due to the following: "She is the first Polish woman who jumped over 14 meters in the triple jump. Polish record holder: triple jump - 14.22 (July 6, 2001 Biała Podlaska). 10-time Polish champion: long jump (2001-2004), triple jump (2000-2004, 2008) and 4-time national vice-champion: triple jump (1996-1998), long jump (2000). 9-time Polish indoor champion: triple jump (1998, 2001–2005), long jump (2001, 2003, 2004) and 5-time national indoor vice-champion: long jump (1998, 2002, 2005), triple jump (1999, 2000) . Personal bests: long jump – 6.63 (July 14, 2002 Szombathely), triple jump – 14.22 (July 6, 2001 Biała Podlaska)." I have no strong opinion as I believe Wikipedia has way too many catalogue-entries for sportspeople who didn't achieve anything, just participated here and there, but it does say she is a "record holder" and "champion", that sounds like something that makes one notable? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:14, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Piotrus, due to the changes in NSPORT, athletes are no longer presumed to meet GNG based on achievements and are required to have at least one GNG source cited in the article at all times (and to meet GNG overall). So none of those accomplishments can contribute to notability. JoelleJay (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak delete. No GNG coverage has been identified, and NSPORT is very clear about its notability requirements. JoelleJay (talk) 02:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Changed to "weak delete" based on the first source found by Pelmeen. GNG requires multiple SIRS, can more be found? JoelleJay (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep based on the active years, offline sources are likely. Google search gives sources like  But it seems Google is unable to find all Polish language sources, see searches on these sites  . -Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Article exists in Polish and she is a recognized athlete, but my vote stays only if sources can be located to satisfy the current WP:NSPORT notability Ppt91 (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.