Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lillian Stiles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  00:56, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Lillian Stiles
Sad story, but WP:ISNOT a memorial. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 19:35, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I remember this story, but that doesn't make it encyclopedic. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  14:07, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

'''Relisting this debate in hopes of generating a more thorough consensus. Please place new discussion below this line.''' → Ξxtreme Unction {yak ł blah } 16:47, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete &mdash; per nom. Yeesh, poor woman. &mdash; RJH 17:16, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom; horrible thing to happen. Sliggy 22:41, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Idont Havaname 21:02, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.