Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lillian Virginia Mountweazel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Fictitious entry. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Lillian Virginia Mountweazel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable hoax, almost no sources. Sufficiently mentioned in fictitious entry. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fictitious entry where 'she' is mentioned. JJL (talk) 00:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fictitious entry. For the record, the article started its life as a redirect to Nihilartikel, which was since moved to fictitious entry. &mdash; Edward Z. Yang (Talk) 02:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge Weak keep or merge to Fictitious entry. An article in the New Yorker, one in the Irish Times and another in the Journal of the Rutgers University Libraries isn't quite enough to have a stand-alone article, but there is additional context here that isn't mentioned at Fictitious entry. Fences and windows (talk) 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.