Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilly Truscott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Agent 86 03:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Lilly Truscott


Expired prod. However the prod reason suggests merging so am listing here to see if anything is salvageable from this article. No Opinion from me. Srikeit 10:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Main characters usually warrant and have their own page. Ohconfucius 03:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, even though I disagree with Ohconfucius. I think it's something that should be decided on a case-by-case basis, depending on the notability of the source material and quality of the article, but in this case, I think it passes (at least marginally) on both measures.  Xtifr tälk 14:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ohconfucius and Xtifr. Pink moon 1287
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.