Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily font


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy kept, as the nominator isn't proposing deletion; see the bullet that includes the text "moving or merging" at WP:SK. Redirects and merges don't result in the deletion of content, so they need to be handled separately. Contact me if you need help proposing and/or completing a merge. Nyttend (talk) 20:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Lily font

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject isn't notable enough to have its own article, as evidenced by the low view-count (average of one view per day, sometimes zero). That no one is searching for the Lily font proves it isn't notable enough and the contents should be merged with Crown Jewels of the United Kingdom. Firebrace (talk) 20:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.