Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lim Joo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Lim Joo
Vanity Francisco Valverde 16:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll speedy delete per WP:CSD A7. By the way, the important thing here is that the article doesn't make any assertion of notability: there's no need to speculate as to whether or not it's "vanity". fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.