Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LimeChat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

LimeChat

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. Software app which lacks non trivial coverage from multiple third party publications, thus failing GNG. JBsupreme ( talk ) 22:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What is GNG? If you are going to argue to delete something based on policy, please link to the policy.  Edward Vielmetti (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Notability, GNG is one of the shortcuts to it.  TJ   Spyke   00:51, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:26, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 02:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  02:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is written in Ruby (has a book mention because of that), and appears popular in Japan based on the news archive hits (click links at the top here). None of those immediately strike me as WP:RS though. Pcap ping  02:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be personal software project without independent coverage currently.  LotLE × talk  23:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep coverage by PCWorld and Cnet. As Pcap notes it seems to be big in Japan walk victor falktalk 16:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment unfortunately, both of those sources are simply copies of the description provided by the software author. Press releases, essentially, and no editorial changes were made by PCWorld or Cnet.  LotLE × talk  19:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm huge in Japan.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) 18:10, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.