Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LimeLife


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Copyright violation removed, notability established.  Jamie ☆ S93  21:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

LimeLife

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Search of Yahoo turned up only one non-trivial article on this company--most other hits appear to be press releases. Not enough notability to overcome high COI. Closing admin should take into account massive spree of linkspamming by accounts linked with this company; see Sockpuppet investigations/Mpmccart. Blueboy96 20:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyvio see here. Also promotional spam written in first person plural. The references are press releases reprinted. Drawn Some (talk) 20:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Drawn some. Purely a promotional fluff piece from a spammer with no true notability asserted, only using copies of their own press releases to give the appearance of it. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 20:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - As blatant advertisement.  Diana LeCrois    : 22:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - an editor has removed the copyrighted material. News, San Jose Mercury News, Washington Post, and BBC have all covered them just to pick a few articles out from a large volume of Google news results.  There are sufficient reliable sources to establish notability.  Adavertising tone can be dealt with htrough editting. -- Whpq (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: per WP:CORP, recognized and covered by independent third-party sources.--It's me...Sallicio!$\color{Red} \oplus$ 02:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The reference section should convince anyone of its notability.  D r e a m Focus  01:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sufficient media coverage suggests notability: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Limelife+-leading&cf=all — Rankiri (talk) 14:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.