Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LimeLife (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article lacked participation, however it was enough for a closure after it was relisted thrice (the limit). I closed this per keep because there wasn't any support for deletion in the debate while there were three editors who supported keep. I could have closed it per NC, but as there wasn't any support for the deletion other than the nom and at least three editors agreed to keep, I'll close it per keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 03:43, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

LimeLife
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominated in 2009. Not sure why it wasn't deleted the first time. This company is not notable and their article is just free promo. If it were one of the most innovative companies in the world it would have a lot more info since 2009. TV | talk 17:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The Forbes article and San Francisco Business Times article seem to establish WP:GNG. It does seem to have fallen off the radar since then, admittedly.  week keep. Morwen - Talk 18:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Unfortunately there's no criteria for "website that generated hype at one point and has since become irrelevant". The given references certainly meet WP:CORP. § FreeRangeFrog 20:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - While I was typing my vote, I considered voting "neutral" but I now think there is enough to suggest some significance especially being the only female-friendly mobile gaming company, despite there hasn't been much activity and it may be due to this 2010 acquisition by Total Beauty Media. Google News found several results and as these results will show they have released several games such as "Law & Order: Celebrity Betrayal" and "Top Chef Challenge", also indicating significance. A year before the acquisition, LimeLife acquired a company of their own, Tapatap, which would also improve the article. I plan to add more content later today, SwisterTwister   talk  21:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.