Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limelight Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Limelight Software

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:GNG. Source searches are not providing enough coverage to qualify an article. North America1000 06:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: References do not provide evidence of notability. Aust331 (talk) 16:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Is this a different Limelight? K.e.coffman (talk) 06:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes there are 2 unrelated companies with similar names. Limelight Networks is not the subject of this afd. 'Limelight Software' is focused on developing music-related software and apps.Dialectric (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I cannot locate sufficient sources to establish notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.