Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limit Login - Windows Concurrent Connection Script


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:02, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Limit Login - Windows Concurrent Connection Script
This an advertisement for a script that someone wrote just a few days ago. Blatant advertising, and does not meet WP:SOFTWARE. --Hetar 06:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, plus non-encyclopedic first person perspective VoiceOfReason 06:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the concern but if you read within the article I am not promoting a script or program someone else wrote, just referencing to it so people can compare what I have created to what microsoft has created. It's not advertising and was created for the scripting community as a useful tool. finally please read through the article again as I belive your comment was sent after I had saved the page before completion. --Jesseboy 06:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia isn't Freshmeat or Sourceforge; we judge software articles by their notability, not their utility. -/- Warren 07:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. -- Koffieyahoo 07:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * So are you saying that if this isn't well known, that it isn't something you would want posted? If this is the case, then I would have to disagree and say how this is definatly a common question amoung Windows network admins that can now be remedied more easily with this script. --Jesseboy 07:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm saying that this isn't an encyclopedic article, but an advertisement for some script. -- Koffieyahoo 08:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Warren. -- Gogo Dodo 07:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. It might be a common question that network admins have, but posting your solution to it here isn't the way to go about things. BigHaz 07:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The article comprises signed documentation, complete with an "e-mail me if you have any questions" conclusion, for a software package. This is a clear mis-use of Wikipedia.  Wikipedia is not a publisher of first instance or a free wiki host.  It is an encyclopaedia.  Software packages must be documented outside of Wikipedia first, and by people other than their authors, before they warrant an article here, per No original research and WP:CORP. Delete. Uncle G 08:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.