Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limobike


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Virgin Group. Clear consensus that this article shouldn't exist, and sufficient consensus here that this is a plausible redirect. Daniel (talk) 00:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Limobike

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Procedural nomination per the outcome of Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_July_26. Editors have asserted that this topic remains non-notable, in which case either deletion or redirection to a related topic is called for. signed,Rosguill talk 20:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 20:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 20:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 20:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:SNOW, WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY, WP:Use common sense. Nobody thinks this article should exist, per WP:PRODUCT, WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:GNG, and yet here we are, performing this procedural pantomime. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:23, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't satisfy anything to exist. FiddleheadLady (talk) 17:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Restore redirect to Virgin Group as WP:ATD. The product did exist, so it's a viable redirect title, or at least the Virgin Limobike title. Only found one source that seemed good enough for SIGCOV, and I found two others that I'm not convinced they are SIGCOV: (opinion article, fairly brief),  (daily mail, deprecated) Jumpytoo Talk 18:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep, re-redirect to Virgin Group. I'm not convinced there are enough sources to justify an article about this particular service. I concur with Jumpytoo in terms of the sources above, and the only other potential sources I could find were one-line name-checks and suggestions the service might be coming to this or that city.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 12:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.