Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 19:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Linak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod. Appears to be a minor manufacturing company at most, with the usual handful of self-published press releases. Might be savable, but it's not making a good case for notability as yet. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I contested the prod, which was placed by someone mass-tagging Brazilian company articles as spam. Notability doesn't appear to have been a concern of the prodder, whose rationale both times (it was re-prodded after I removed it) was based on calling it advertising.  Nyttend (talk) 12:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:40, 18 January 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete - Spammy and unsourced piece that should have been PRODded away... Carrite (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.