Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lincity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Mandsford 21:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Lincity

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable game that depends solely on one source. Nilocia (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to LinCity-NG. There is some coverage for this game in the reliable sources. See for example this article published by the Washington Post or another review at CNN.--Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Vejvančický. — I-20 the highway  17:39, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * So you'll both be lending your editing tools to going back to this 2007 version of the article and this 2007 version of the other article, then? Uncle G (talk) 20:10, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * @Uncle G: It is possible to write an informative article about a game, sources are present. All we need is competent editor. The "oldid" is irrelevant here. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 21:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, it's relevant because, as you can see, in 2007 we had what you state you wanted above, an article at LinCity-NG. So are you going to use your editing tools to support going back to that? Uncle G (talk) 01:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, the naming is a question for editors who are familiar with the game. It isn't the most important thing at AfD. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - A quick two-minute search yields good results at Joystiq, a feature at 1UP, Google Books shows some semi-promising results too. --Teancum (talk) 23:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and introduce the above references inlined into the article. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 17:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for all the reasons listed above. --Gyrobo (talk) 03:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.