Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lincoln!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete both, g1, patent nonsense. NawlinWiki 18:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Lincoln! and Ragnar Nordenskiöld
Complete nonsense articles, vehemently defended by editors whose almost all contributions are to these articles. If this game even exists, it is not notable, and I am fairly sure this "Ragnar Nordenskiöld" person does not exist. Delete both. J I P | Talk 17:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Lies!

They both exist and are famous! I have seen them. Furthermore, I see no proof in your accusation!128.122.9.99 17:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC) — 128.122.9.99 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

What proof hath ye that they doth not exist? I have played it with my Knights! - Arthur Pendragon, King Of The Brittons


 * Strong delete as unfunny hoax. Do you think it's called "Elizabeth!" in Canada? -- Charlene 17:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per Charlene (probably called "Lizzie". Canuckle 17:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep The only way to settle this is with a game of Lincoln! Tournament rules. -Ragnar Nordenskiöld
 * Twice edit conflicted speedy delete as hoax. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 17:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I've gone ahead and tagged you as (loser) in real life.-God
 * Comment. I keep removing an attack by User:128.122.9.99, which that user keeps re-adding. Said comment is above. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 17:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as humor. Kid Jack
 * That was actually my "attack", but I would rather call it an amusing barb at someone during a discussion. Definitely not vicious, and probably funny to everyone but that who it was directed at. Which actually was whoever this vandal 128.122.9.99 is. -Vengeance000 17:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Either way, it wasn't nice. AND DON'T CHANGE OTHERS' VOTES. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Didn't you change other people's votes? Maybe you should be banned. The infamous 128.122.9.99 18:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I was only changing them back to what they actually did vote. User:Charlene.fic voted "Strong delete"... SOMEone changed it to "keep", and I changed it back to User:Charlene.fic's actual vote. I was simply reverting vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Encyclopedias aren't always nice. -Vengeance000 18:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have blocked both Vengeance000 and 128.122.9.99 for 24 hours for repeated falsifying of other people's AfD votes. J I P  | Talk 18:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Bless you. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Vengeance is right -- he didn't alter votes, only the anon did. However, Vengeance was still being a pain in the @$$ in this vote... Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. -- Charlene 18:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete And a protest: Why is this being AfD'd?!? This would go in my top ten of most obvious CSDs ever.  --Jaysweet 18:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, but make a copy for BJAODN. Yeah, and this should've been speedy deleted per WP:SNOW.  Useight 18:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.