Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lincoln Courts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 14:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Lincoln Courts

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Small housing project council estate in Northern Ireland. The only assertion of notability is a passing mention in a BBC article as an example of what various orgs were doing with revenue from the lottery. --Dynaflow  babble  17:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * delete as non-notable. DES (talk) 19:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as Non-notable  --DizFreak talk Contributions 20:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep If it's mentioned by Britain's top TV station, then it is marginally notable.--Kylohk 14:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not meet WP:N or any other notability guideline.  Passing mention in BBC article is evidence of existence but not evidence (or even assertion really) of notability.-- Kubigula (talk) 04:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 05:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete Minor notability from media, but not quite enough Guycalledryan 08:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mention in Beeb article on Lottery funding ≠ "multiple, non-trivial references".  tomasz.  12:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - 200 houses = perhaps 900 people. That is bigger than some villages.  This is a stub and should be tagged so.  Nevertheless it is only a small community in a substantial city.  Peterkingiron 18:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing in the article is an attempt to assert notability.  Are we saying any housing project is notable by default? If not, then the article needs to be deleted. Vegaswikian 05:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.