Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lincoln Land express


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  07:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Lincoln Land express

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources, company does not exist any longer, mainly contains negative information about company written possibly by a competitor. AlmostGrad (talk) 05:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found some references by searching for LEX Express, and I think that notability is now established. The negative tone of the article is justified by the facts. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  06:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  06:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Wow, I had no clue LEX was closed down. They've been around a long time, and had a lot of press. Maybe not as much as Suburban's negative press, but it's enough to pass WP:GNG. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 19:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep since sources establish notability. The tone of the article might not be neutral, but that's not a reason for deletion. Edge3 (talk) 09:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.