Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Black (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  16:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Linda Black
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I was actually PRODing this with the follwing: "Nothing to suggest satisfying WP:CREATIVE as my searches found nothing better than a few passing mentions at News and browsers." until I noticed the 1st AfD so here we are. My searches found nothing better and the listed sources at the 1st AfD are not enough to suggest this satisfies the notability guidelines. Notifying past AfDers and. SwisterTwister  talk  07:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom, the subject does not meet BLP or GNG. Delta13C (talk) 09:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep We've been down this road before. This name googles, she is regarded as a celebrity in Singapore.  This source specifically identifies her as such.  She has an active series of hosting duties including the Miss Earth 2013 pageant.  The last time this was up for AfD another editor followed up to remove a bunch of sources from the article.  That's a pretty disingenuous tactic to try to get an article deleted.  Under another AfD attack again, its easy to add more sources, I just stopped because ten is more than enough.  I don't see what attracts people to pick on this article, but there is no good cause to delete. Trackinfo (talk) 09:06, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    09:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    09:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    09:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep she appears to meet WP:BASIC. Some of the sources provided are in-depth. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 21:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep She passes GNG, no question. I added some other sources, as well. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.