Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Danielsson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Linda Danielsson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:BLP of a smalltown municipal councillor, not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NPOL #2. As always, municipal councillors are not deemed "inherently" notable enough to get automatic inclusion in Wikipedia just because they exist -- at the local level of office, the notability test is the ability to write and source a substantive article demonstrating a credible reason to treat her as much, much more notable than the norm for smalltown municipal councillors by virtue of her political impact. But there's no real substance here above and beyond "she's a municipal councillor who exists", and the references are two primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and two very short media blurbs about her which aren't substantive enough to get her over the bar all by themselves if they're the strongest sources on offer. And the Swedish article is even more weakly sourced than this, and doesn't feature any new sources that could be pulled over to make a difference (the only footnote that isn't already here appears to just be a census document rather than a notability-building source). Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have much, much more sourcing and substance than just stating and verifying that she exists. Bearcat (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Easily fails WP:NPOL, and nothing exists to pass WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 22:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom. Not important enough to warrant an article. Oaktree b (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Linda Danielsson is Notable in Mullsjö. Spitzfizzer (talk) 08:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Being notable within a town of less that 6,000 inhabitants does automatically equal notability on an international encyclopedia. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete GNG is not met here Yaxı Hökmdarz (talk) 18:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.