Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Johnsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No consensus to delete. It seems the subject is notable as there are reliable sources that have been pointed out. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy  ( talk ) 07:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Linda Johnsen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable bio with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, Article does list a reliable source, the complete idiot's guide to Hinduism. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 01:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep under WP:CREATIVE; wrote a dozen books, particularly complete idiot's guide; Her books are well known, from glancing at the results of about 60 google book hits not written by her.John Z (talk) 06:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply If her books are notable, why are there no reviews? Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 11:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep&mdash;She appears well published and her works are available from Amazon and B&N, as well as scanned into Google books. Seems sufficiently notable to me.&mdash;RJH (talk) 16:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Well published, and not self-published at that. ~ priyanath talk 00:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.