Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Underhill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Linda Underhill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails to establish notability, Subject seems to fail WP:NACADEMIC and WP:AUTHOR. A Google search produced this article and an Amazon hit for her books. News search had no results. The source listed in article and the external link do not mention subject at all. CBS 527 Talk 20:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 21:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 21:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Her work appears to have made negligible impact in books or scholar. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete - I think that there's enough information to expand the article a little, but I am not seeing a clear sign of notability based upon the news, book, scholar sources.— CaroleHenson &thinsp; (talk) 00:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails academic and author. Not notable. SW3 5DL (talk) 02:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - assuming she was chair of a department, that would only be one factor towards WP:PROF. I'm sympathetic.... Bearian (talk) 19:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.