Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linden Chuang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Linden Chuang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:BIO; we do not just create articles about everyone who works on every TV Show (InFocus doesn't even have an article). Of the six sources, he is mentioned in the first, but is not discussed in depth, they just mention his name. The second doesn't mention him at all. The third, an IMDB profile, is quite brief indeed. The fourth is just a Vimeo Channel, the fifth mentions him as the winner of a prize from an organization (Adventist Media Network) which does not have a Wikipedia article. Additionally, the creator of this article seems to have a connection with its subject, given sentences like " He has kept a number of reptiles as pets over the years." and "In his spare time, he enjoys playing basketball and watching Formula 1." Jinkinson  talk to me  23:12, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Per WP:GNG. The awards are not significant enough for WP:ANYBIO, since they have connection to Seventh-day Adventist they are not independent markers of notability. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Awards are within-organization type things that do not carry sufficient significance; positions are not inherently notable. --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.