Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Archer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Lindsay Archer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

CV of a commercial artist, with no assertions of notability other than a list of commercial products she's done the artwork for, nor any reliable sources indicating same. CalendarWatcher (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Artist has contributed to published works I would consider notable. The claims are verifiable, but not having sources for verifiable claims isn't a reason to delete the article. This is a stub article that needs improving, that's all. =Axlq 22:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If there aren't any sources for claims, then a priori they're not verifiable, aren't they? But more to the point, as fame is not contagious, 'contributing to' is a phrase with very little weight. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 09:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 22:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 22:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 22:27, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: The burden of proof for sources and verifiability is on editors who wish to keep an article. I even own one of the works listed in the article, and have never heard of this person before ... just as I haven't heard of the typesetters, the factcheckers, the line editors or anyone else who contributed other than the author.  By the bye, we also don't generally hold the authors of RPGs notable unless they otherwise meet the criteria of WP:BIO, or with a dozen RPG books under my belt, I'd have a Wikipedia article myself.    RGTraynor  14:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per RGTraynor. Darrenhusted (talk) 15:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.