Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Manufacturing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 00:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Lindsay Manufacturing

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 02:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions.  –  Eastmain  ( talk ) 00:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  –  Eastmain  ( talk ) 00:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added several references. The article should be moved to Lindsay Corporation, the company's correct name. Companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange, such as this one, are quite likely to be notable. – Eastmain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs  · [/wiki/Special:Log/move?user= page moves ] · block user  · [ block log ] ) 01:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly. Note that this is a manufacturer of center pivot irrigation systems.  An established manufacturer of hard goods under its own brands and with a noticeable physical presence, to be sure: but in other contexts routine coverage of the naming of a corporate chairman, or being named to the National Agri-Marketing Association Agribusiness Leader of the Year honor roll would not be the sort of coverage that confers notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 12:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Would even qualify by German wikipedia standards: over 1K employees, over $400M revenue, etc. It's been around since 1955, so there's plenty of coverage. Pcap  ping  11:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong keep. Clearly notable. • Freechild   'sup?   04:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * keep Large, old company. Sources show up easily from google. See for example this search. JoshuaZ (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.