Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Pearce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. There is disagreement on whether the notability guidelines are met. As the article has been relisted twice, I see no reason to keep the discussion open. Since the article does have sources, the basic criteria of WP:V and WP:BLP appear to be satisfied so the lack of consensus defaults to keep. Sjakkalle (Check!)  18:34, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Lindsay Pearce

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable person. Her only claims to fame are appearing on a reality show (in which she was only a runner-up) and appearing in just 2 episodes of a TV show, in which she was not a major role. JDDJS (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails WP:NACTOR. The role in Glee was not just "not a major role", it was very minor. She only appeared in two songs and had a bit of dialogue in episodes 1 & 8 of season 2 (i.e. not even in sequential episodes). There are plenty of non-notable actors who have appeared far more often on Glee. --AussieLegend (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: She has had lead roles in two stage musicals (Los Angeles and San Antonio) and will be playing the lead in Spring Awakening in Los Angeles next month. Just because her article does not yet reflect these things does not mean she hasn't done them, nor that she hasn't received significant critical mention for both her Glee debut and her theatrical performances. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. The only thing about the musicals is that you have to show that the musicals themselves were notable in that they received lots of coverage through independent and reliable sources. Starring in lead roles in a musical is good, but it really only counts towards notability if you have the sources to show it's notable. When it comes down to it, sourcing is usually what decides whether an article is kept or not.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Keep: While San Antionio is not a major theatrical outlet, LA is- and Spring Awakening (assuming its a professional and not CT production) is a major work. Also- she has won 2nd place in a reality TV show and had a minor role in the 3rd season of Glee. Knowing Glee- it is entirely possible she could return. I would say Keep for now- but if she does not continue to progress, then reconsider later.Nightenbelle (talk) 03:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Her appearances on The Glee Project and Glee don't meet the notability requirements of WP:NACTOR. Rather than keep a non-compliant article, the article should be deleted and recreated if she meets the requirements, not retained and then deleted at some indeterminate time in the future if she doesn't meet the requirements. If we were to do what you suggest we could create articles on anyone, not just those who should have an article. --AussieLegend (talk) 05:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. No claims in article or this discussion suggest that WP:ENT, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:GNG is met. Good faith media search likewise didn't yield any coverage that suggest that. Bongo  matic  14:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  06:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article's current sources clearly demonstrate notability. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Which source or sources do you think demonstrate notability? This is (in its current form) not a policy-based rationale. Bongo  matic  22:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.