Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Soto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Lindsay Soto

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nn talking head on tv. The Emmy the article claims she won is not mentioned at the Emmy's official website and without the Emmy, she fails WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep this site says she's "Emmy award-winning", but I haven't really looked into to the reliability of it, hence only weak keep - Kingpin13 (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since the Emmy win can't be verified and no other sources seem to exist. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 18:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, we are not supposed to be using primary sources in the first place (ESPECIALLY WHEN THOSE PRIMARY SOURCES ARE BLOGS) but beyond that the person does not meet WP:BIO anyhow. JBsupreme (talk) 18:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I found refs, but they're Los Angeles area Emmys - so still fails wp:bio. -- Jeandré, 2009-04-15t19:06z
 * Delete per nom and WP:BIO T-95 (talk) 19:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep notable television personality on Fox Sports Net. Her LA Emmy was big enough to warrant mention in the most important trade paper in the entertainment industry, Variety (source). LA isn't Des Moines or Boston, its the center of the entertainment industry. If we can have articles on all the ESPN personalities (which we do), I think a Fox Sports Net personality passes the test. --Bobak (talk) 19:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This sounds too much like WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS to me, but we will have to agree to disagree on the point of notability here. JBsupreme (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The only listed blog is written by a sports reporter and it (the blog) is linked directly to a notable publication. Everything that makes a blog a reliable source. The Emmy's were important enough to get coverage in a big trade magazine. Clearly verifiable and notable (through the awards). - Mgm|(talk) 22:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Regional emmy is it not? ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lack of of references to support claims, fails WP:BIO. Tiptoety  talk 22:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.