Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Tigar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:29, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Lindsay Tigar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

someone who is known for a dating blog AND being one of the most eligible singles! (Granted NYC is very huge and being famous there does mean something-but still this does not quite mean a page is needed) Wgolf (talk) 22:56, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 23:49, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. One short mention in a tabloid is insufficient. Pburka (talk) 00:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - for the sake of fairness, she's also a regular contributor to Women's Health magazine but I don't think that adds much to be honest. We need coverage of her, not coverage by her.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 01:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Other than a mention as being "most eligible", Tigar has yet to actually be the focus of any true in-depth coverage. I can't see where she ultimately passes notability guidelines. Being a writer for a notable magazine can help gain coverage, but it's never a guarantee and being a potentially reliable source yourself (predominantly for the WH articles, I'd assume) would not mean that you pass notability guidelines either. Also, the popularity of her blog doesn't guarantee notability either- it would also make it more likely she'd gain coverage, but again- it's not a guarantee. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:08, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not enough coverage in reliable sources yet.  I'm actually the most eligible single on Wikipedia, but robots don't really date much. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Not even if you're a ninja pirate hybrid? Man, the dating scene is so harsh... Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per Tokyogirl79 and NinjaRobotPirate could not find third party sources about her.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Spumuq (talk) 09:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.