Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsey Doe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 19:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Lindsey Doe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG Darkness Shines (talk) 07:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The article fails WP:GNG, WP:N, and WP:BLP. I have initiated a discussion at WP:BLPN to discuss the claims of notability on the talk page. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - about as badly sourced as a BLP can get: YouTube, and the subject's personal web page and blog. Bearian (talk) 20:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete She's an adjunct professor, which makes her almost certainly not notable on those grounds. The best source is a local paper article on her, and that is not very good. Nothing even close to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inadequate sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.