Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Nepalese throne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Line of succession to the former Nepalese throne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This throne has been defunct since 2008. WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the monarchy doesn't exist anymore. See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. There are also WP:BLP concerns about the people who are listed here, including at least two minors.

So basically, the same reasons as the previous 32 lines of succession to defunct thrones that have been deleted recently (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32). TompaDompa (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete there is no reason to catalog the succession to a throne that does not exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to King of Nepal. Most of the content is details of the succession while the monarchy still existed, which would make a suitable addition to that article. The current claimed line of succession must be the same as the line of succession when the monarchy was abolished (because everyone was born before that date), that would also be a reasonable thing to add.  Hut 8.5  17:51, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Smeat75 (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devoke water  (talk)  19:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Nika2020 (talk) 22:23, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nepal decided they were no longer going to be a monarchy and it is not our place to tell them they are wrong. Agricolae (talk) 23:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - The first reason for deletion is like proposing to delete article on Dinosaur becuse they do not exist anymore. The article has already been converted to the past tense, so I think it is not an irrelevant information. The title of the article however is misguiding- it should read something like Line of succession of the last Nepalese throne. Regarding the source, they can be improved.nirmal (talk) 13:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * No this is like proposing a deletion on an article about how things would have happened if the earth had not had an austroid impact that disrupted dinosaurs.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:27, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - as there's no throne to be in line of succession for. GoodDay (talk) 16:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Selectively merge -- There is nothing in the article King of Nepal on the family of the last king. I note that this article refers to a royalist party, so that restoration may not be completely impossible.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.