Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of Bhopal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Line of succession to the former throne of Bhopal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This throne has been defunct since 1949. WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore. See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. There are also WP:BLP concerns about the people who are listed here, including at least ten minors.

So basically, the same reasons as the previous 32 lines of succession to defunct thrones that have been deleted recently (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32). TompaDompa (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete there is no reason to give this a seperate article. Anything worth saying can be included within the article on the Nawabs of Bhopal.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete  per nom. Smeat75 (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  -- Devoke water   (talk)  19:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - the monarchy has been abolished, meaning the line of succession is currently: nobody. Agricolae (talk) 22:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Nika2020 (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's no throne to be in line of succession for. GoodDay (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete There is too much WP:OR. Either way not needed since Nawabs of Bhopal exists. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 15:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Nawabs of Bhopal: there is a lot of content in this article which is not in that one. Despite the amalgamation of the state into India in c.1948, the Nawabs were entitled to a Privy Purse from the Indian government until Indira Gandhi's government abolished such.  I suspect someone is still the titular nawab.  We cannot have an article with the title of the present one, because as others have said there is no prospect of succession.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, long defunct throne to which succession is theoretical.--Hippeus (talk) 12:47, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing of value worth keeping Spiderone  08:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.